UNIVERSITY VIRTUAL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT INTEGRATION WITH THE ZOOM SERVICE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31471/1993-9965-2025-1(58)-97-107Abstract
This study examines the most commonly used online meeting systems, analyzing their advantages and disadvantages, and justifies the choice of Zoom as a primary platform for organizing the educational process under conditions of digital transformation. Particular attention is given to the flexibility, scalability, and accessibility of Zoom, which make it suitable for a wide range of educational scenarios—from traditional lectures to interactive seminars and group projects. The paper explores Zoom’s integration with popular learning management systems (LMS), including Moodle, Google Classroom, Microsoft Teams, and others, as well as the development of inde-pendent adapter services for linking university educational software with video conferencing platforms. The study refines the structure of an extended information system for a higher education institution, including its interaction with Zoom servers and clients, and with internal IT services. The advantages of adapting Zoom to meet the specific needs of universities are analyzed, particularly the development of custom integrations for connecting internal learning management systems, electronic gradebooks, assessment modules, timetables, and other services used in the educational environment. Such integration supports the optimization of administrative processes, facilitates instructors' work, automates routine tasks, and ensures convenient student access to learning materials in both synchronous and asynchronous modes. Special attention is also given to data protection and security issues related to the use of Zoom in educational settings. Mechanisms ensuring confidentiality and system reliability are examined in detail, including user authentication, multi-level data encryption, secure communication channels, and con-trolled access to learning sessions. The study concludes that integrating Zoom significantly enhances the quality, flexibility, and accessibility of education in the context of globalization, digitalization, and crisis-related challenges in the education sector.
Downloads
References
Massner C. Who’s Zooming Who: A Case Study of Videoconferencing’s Effects on Faculty and Students. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science. 2022. Vol. 6. P. 602-619. http://dx.doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.412
Vladova G., Ullrich A., Bender B., Gronau N. Students’ Acceptance of Technology-Mediated Teaching – How It Was Influenced During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020: A Study From Germany. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021. Vol. 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636086 .
Fauville G., Luo M., Queiroz A. C. M., Bailenson J. N., Hancock J. T. Zoom Exhaustion & Fatigue Scale: Validity and Reliability. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 2021. Vol. 4. 100119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100119 .
Grandinetti J. "From the classroom to the cloud": Zoom and the platformization of higher education. First Monday. 2022. № 27(2). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v27i2.11655.
Sutria Y., Lubis R. Zoom meeting cloud application as a distance learning alternative (PJJ) in the COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika. 2021. Vol. 10. Р. 129. https://doi.org/10.24114/
jpf.v10i2.13990.
Vandenberg S., Magnuson M. A Comparison of Student and Faculty Attitudes on the use of Zoom: A Mixed-Methods Study. Nurse Education in Practice. 2021. Vol. 54. 103138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103138.
Barreto I. B., Sanchez R. M. S., Sanchez W. S., Jordan O. H., Escalante J. D. B. The Process of Digital Transformation in Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Professional Business Review. 2023. Vol. 8(9). e03770. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/
v8i9.3770
Nalaka G.P.S., Ranagala D.L., Gunarathne G.R.N., Dhammasiri M., Gamaralalage I., Prabashin N. Academics’ Intention to Use Zoom Meetings for Teaching. Anatolian Journal of Education. 2023. Vol. 8. P. 99-112. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2023.827a.
Asgarov T., Badalova N. Digital Tools in Education. Scientific research. 2024. Vol. 4. P.37-42. https://doi.org/10.36719/2789-6919/40/37-42.
Heiser R., Palalas A., Gollert A. Digital well-being begins with inclusion: A systematic review of videoconferencing guidelines for equitable learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2025. Vol. 41(1). P. 18–26. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9552.
Kędzior M. GDPR and Beyond—A Year of Changes in the Data Protection Landscape of the European Union. ERA Forum. 2019. Vol.19. P. 505–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-019-00549-x.
Schrameyer A. R., Graves T. M., Hua D. M., Harvey J. Online Student Collaboration and FERPA Considerations. TechTrends. 2016. Vol. 60. P. 540–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0117-5.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Авторські права....