Criteria-based approach to justifying the stiffness parameters of elastic hangers in above-ground pipeline crossings

Authors

  • Ye. Yo. Ripetskyi Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas 76019, Karpatska Str., 15, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
  • R. Yo. Ripetskyi Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas 76019, Karpatska Str., 15, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
  • O. І. Nepeliak Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas 76019, Karpatska Str., 15, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31471/1993-9965-2026-1(60)-25-35

Keywords:

above-ground pipeline; elastic hanger; support stiffness; stress-strain state; matrix method; modelling; displacement.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to substantiate a criterion-based approach to selecting stiffness parameters of elastic hangers in above-ground pipeline crossings based on the ratio between hanger stiffness and equivalent pipeline stiffness. The relevance of the research is determined by the need to improve reliability and design
efficiency of pipeline systems through a rational choice of support characteristics. The methodology is based on discrete modelling of the “pipeline–elastic hanger” system, where distributed parameters are replaced by equi-valent concentrated stiffnesses, enabling the use of matrix analysis methods. A dimensionless stiffness criterion is introduced as the ratio of hanger stiffness to the equivalent pipeline stiffness at the attachment point, providing a generalized parameter for describing system interaction. Numerical analysis revealed regularities in pipeline dis-placements and load distribution depending on the criterion value. Three characteristic operating regimes were identified: a “soft” hanger regime dominated by pipeline flexibility, a transitional regime of joint interaction, and a “stiff” hanger regime where hangers carry most of the load. The highest efficiency in controlling deformations is achieved within the transitional range. The proposed approach enables evaluation of hanger system efficiency, prediction of deformation behaviour, and justification of rational stiffness parameters. Its application ensures an optimal balance between flexibility and load-bearing capacity, improves operational reliability, and reduces the risk of excessive stresses and local overloads.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Yanul, S., Pavlov, K., Korotia, M., & Haliant, S. (2019). Kharakterystyka hazotransportnoi systemy Ukrainy [Characteristics of the gas transport system of Ukraine]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Skhidnoievropeiskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Lesi Ukrainky, 1(17), 31–38. (in Ukrainian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.29038/2411-4014-2019-01-31-38.

2. Hrudz, V. Ya., Tymkiv, D. F., Mykhalkiv, V. B., & Kostiv, V. V. (2009). Obsluhovuvannia i remont hazoprovodiv: Monohrafiia [Maintenance and repair of gas pipelines: A monograph]. Lileia-NV. (in Ukrainian)

3. Antaki, G. A. (2003). Piping and pipeline engineering: Design, construction, maintenance, integrity, and repair. Marcel Dekker. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203911150.

4. Ripetskyi, Ye. Yo., Ripetskyi, R. Yo., & Nepeliak, O. I. (2025). Otrymannia matrytsi podatlyvosti nesuchoho kanatu odnoprolitnoho vysiachoho truboprovodu [Obtaining the compliance matrix of the carrying cable of a single-span suspension pipeline]. Prykarpatskyi visnyk NTSH. Chyslo, (20(76)), 227–243. (in Ukrainian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31471/2304-7399-2025-20(76)-227-243.

5. Trevoho, I., Kukhtar, D., Ilkiv, E., Zhytar, D., & Lavrishko, Ie. (2024). Monitoring the position of overhead crossings of main pipelines using total stations. Paper presented at the International Conference of Young Professionals «GeoTerrace-2024». DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2024510095.

6. Taraievskyi, O. (2014). Deiaki aspekty tekhnichnoho stanu mahistralnykh truboprovodiv iz urakhuvanniam yikh tryvaloi ekspluatatsii [Some aspects of the technical condition of main pipelines taking into account their long-term operation]. Naftohazova haluz Ukrainy, (6), 43–46. (in Ukrainian)

7. Carpenter, J. A., & Becht, C. (2007). Pipe supports and restraints. ASME Press.

8. Mahalif, V. Ya. (2010). Truboprovody teplovykh elektrostantsii: Monohrafiia [Pipelines of thermal power plants: A monograph]. Vyshcha shkola. (in Ukrainian)

9. Peng, L. C., & Peng, T. (2009). Pipe stress engineering. ASME Press.

10. Timoshenko, S. P., & Gere, J. M. (2009). Theory of elastic stability (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

11. Oliinyk, A. P., Feshanych, L. I., & Chernyshov, M. Yu. (2022). Matematychne modeliuvannia protsesu deformuvannia truboprovodiv, shcho ekspluatuiutsia v pidzemnomu ta nadzemnomu rezhymakh [Mathematical modeling of the process of deformation of pipelines operated in underground and overhead modes]. Metody ta prylady kontroliu yakosti, (2(49)), 89–94. (in Ukrainian) https://doi.org/10.31471/1993-9981-2022-2(49)-89-94.

12. Hrudz, V. Ya., Tutko, T. F., & Pyrih, T. Yu. (2019). Vilni kolyvannia nadzemnoi dilianky mahistralnoho hazoprovodu pislia prokhodzhennia po nii ochysnoho chy diahnostychnoho porshnia [Free vibrations of the overhead section of the main gas pipeline after the passage of a cleaning or diagnostic pig through it]. Rozvidka ta rozrobka naftovykh i hazovykh rodovyshch, (3(72)), 69–75. (in Ukrainian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31471/1993-9973-2019-3(72)-69-75.

13. Jazar, R. N., & Marzbani, H. (2024). Mechanical vibrations modeling. In Vehicle Vibrations (pp. 143–198). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43486-0_4

14. Pilkey, W. D., & Kitiş, L. (1995). Dynamic stiffness matrix for a beam element with shear deformation. Shock and Vibration, 2(2), 155–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/sav-1995-2206.

15. Teviashev, A. D., & Shevchenko, L. D. (2022). Matematychne modeliuvannia system i protsesiv: Pidruchnyk [Mathematical modeling of systems and processes: A textbook]. KHNURE. (in Ukrainian)

Published

2026-05-29

How to Cite

Ripetskyi, Y. Y., Ripetskyi, R. Y., & Nepeliak O. І. (2026). Criteria-based approach to justifying the stiffness parameters of elastic hangers in above-ground pipeline crossings. Scientific Bulletin of Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, (1(60), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.31471/1993-9965-2026-1(60)-25-35